Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nico Hipfl vs Leopold Zima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hipfl vs Zima analysis and find out who is favored!
Nico Hipfl vs Leopold Zima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hipfl 0 - 0 Zima
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hipfl has won 49.25% of points on their second serve, while Zima has won 42.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hipfl, in recent form, has won 47.17% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zima has won 45.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.74% and 27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hipfl has saved 57.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zima has saved 53.76% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hipfl has won 75% of matches played (W/L 3/ 1), with Zima winning 52.94% (W/L 27/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hipfl has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2). Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 61/ 58).
- Player level: In the last year, Hipfl has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 3/ 1), where as Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.1% of matches (W/L 27/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hipfl has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Zima has played against players with an average rank of 129.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hipfl has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zima has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hipfl has converted 40% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zima has converted 39.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
895
Rank
774
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
60% (3-2)
Career Total W/L
56% (158-126)
75% (3-1)
YTD W/L
62% (18-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nico Hipfl | Leopold Zima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 75% (3/1) | 62% (18/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 57% (38/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (46/43) | 51% (334/315) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 50% (6/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 3 | 70 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 11 | 36 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 105.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (77/144) | 67% (663/986) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (54/77) | 69% (460/663) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (33/67) | 42% (136/323) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (4/10) | 39% (28/71) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (50/140) | 34% (313/924) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 64% (18/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 62% (18/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 78% (7/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 23% (13/3) |
Nico Hipfl Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Jerome Kym
Player
Nico Hipfl
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
41%
(
20 of
49)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nico Hipfl
Player
Jiri Barnat
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Niklas Waldner
Player
Nico Hipfl
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filippo Romano
Player
Leopold Zima
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve %
72%
(
23 of
32)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
40
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Leopold Zima
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Milos Karol
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Leopold Zima
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(12) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Yannik Kelm
Player
Leopold Zima
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Leopold Zima
Player
Emanuele Turconi
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
72%
(
33 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Hipfl Vs Zima Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Hipfl are available here and Zima photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
